Water Conditioning & Purification Magazine

Iron and Manganese Removal – Options and Cautions

By Matthew Wirth

Iron, manganese and hydrogen sulfide gas are all nuisance actors in water. They exist in various forms and they complex with other waterborne contaminants to create difficult compounds to control. Because of this, there cannot be a single-source solution for controlling these common water issues. The tools required to combat problem water nuisances vary with the form these metals and gases present themselves in a specific water supply. While science and theory abound on this topic, it sometimes helps to just look at working solutions, discuss how they work and what pitfalls exist with a particular technology. This article will concentrate on iron and manganese, but hydrogen sulfide plays a role in managing these metals.Read on.

The simplest forms of iron are ferrous (Fe2+) and ferric (Fe3+). Iron that is in solution (Fe2+) and remains in solution, is simply removed through ion exchange. Ferrous iron is divalent and will exchange for sodium using cation resin. Ion exchange is also effective in controlling manganous manganese (the divalent form of Mn2+.) It is also possible (and more environmentally responsible) to strip Fe2+ using catalytic collection. Catalytic collection allows the iron in solution to temporarily bond to the catalyst supported by the media substrate. During the service cycle, this form of iron is captured and held until backwash. The air scour and backwash cycle clean the media of the iron solids and send them to drain. This method of removing ferrous iron uses no chemicals or regenerants. It simply uses ambient air and O2 to recharge the media during the scour and backwash cycles to recharge the media.

When iron is oxidized into its ferric state (Fe3+), it requires mechanical separation for removal. Mechanical straining differs, depending on the particle size of the iron floc. A smaller floc requires tighter filtration; conversely a larger floc allows for larger micron solutions. Iron particles that are submicron and colloidal usually require a flocculant to increase the size of the floc or dead-end process filtration to control.

Dead-end filtration is a batch process where water is forced through a separation (filter) medium. Retained particles stay behind on the filter surface and in the case of a depth filter, within the medium while water flows through. Accumulated particles will eventually block or plug the filter, requiring its replacement. Process filtration allows for both nominal (approximate) and absolute (exact) micron filtration—an advantage when targeting a particular particle size. If 99.9-percent removal is not critical, nominal filters offer a less expensive option. If the targeted particle must come out, one uses absolute process filtration solutions.

Backwashing filter solutions range from natural zeolite (Clinoptilolite) that captures particulates in the 5- to 12-micron (µm) range to coarse media designed to catch particles over 20 µm. There is a large variety of media and mixed media available for particulates (Fe3+) larger than 12 µm. Multi-media filters generally trap particles down to 12-20 microns. Traditional commercially available filter media are effective on particles less than 20 µm (see Chart 1). Both of these applications, ion exchange and mechanical straining, are simple technologies and easily accomplished with standard equipment.

Ion exchange for ferrous (clear water) iron and Mn2+
Ion exchange for divalent cations is just another way to say water softener. Cautions with this application include limiting iron loading. Use compensated hardness calculations by adding four grains for every mg/L of Fe2+ and Mn2+. Being conservative with NaCl (salt) and attempting to maximize capacity throughput is fine for regular water softening applications. This practice may result in damage to the resin bed in water with high iron and manganese content. Be generous with the NaCl and conservative with the capacities in problem water.

Note: Softening resin prefers calcium (predominant hardness mineral) to iron 3.1 to 1.7 in selectivity respectively. This means the resin is 1.8 times more selective for hardness over divalent ferrous iron. Why is this important? Iron leakage can occur if the hardness penetrates too far into the resin column, thus driving off the iron and releasing it into the soft water. This is why a softener installed for Fe2+ and Mn2+ needs to regenerate more often and use more NaCl.

Do an iron speciation test to ensure that the Fe3+ is < 0.3 mg/L. A speciation test indicates how a tested substance exists in its different forms in a single sample. With iron, it will show how much is ferrous and how much is ferric. Manganese resists oxidation in pH < 8.4 (Hem, 1963). Therefore, in most waters it exists as Mn2+.

Use a resin cleaner to help control ferric iron build-up and help prevent fouling of the resin beads. Sulfite-based resin cleaners work in preventing ferrous iron from converting to ferric in the brine tank and system, while phosphate sequesters ferric iron and keeps it soluble. These resin cleaners are typically used in small doses and only partly compensate. They are seldom used at high enough doses to remove foulants already formed (Meyers, 2020).

Any standard softening resin will exchange Fe2+ and Mn2+ for sodium as it does hardness. Standard resin beads range in size from 16- to 50-mesh. The largest 16-mesh beads are over twice the size of the smallest 50-mesh bead. The larger the bead, the longer the flow (kinetic) path through the bead matrix (see Image 1).

An ion exchange resin bead is a porous structure with 99 percent of its exchange sites on the inside of the bead (see Image 2). The longer the Fe2+ is inside the bead, the more likely it will oxidize into Fe+3 and get trapped inside the resin bead structure, plugging it. Once the bead is plugged, it is no longer fully functional. A smaller bead has a shorter kinetic path through its matrix and iron is less likely to oxidize inside and create fouling. This makes smaller uniform particle size (UPS) resin beads, 30- to 50-mesh, a better choice in iron water because of its uniform particle size. This is also accomplished with a shallow-shell approach where the resin bead ion exchange matrix is introduced around a solid core center. By not allowing water to pass through the center of the bead, the diffusion path is limited to a narrowed exterior shell around the non-penetrable solid core (see Image 3).

This resin offers a number of economic advantages over conventional 16 x 50-mesh resins. The small, uniform bead size results in rapid ion exchange kinetics during operation, more complete regeneration of the resin and faster, more thorough rinse following regeneration. In addition, this predictability of outcome allows for greater accuracy in sizing, efficiency and throughput. If everything acts the same, outcomes are equivalent.

Captured air versus catalytic collection
Captured air systems are very popular today. They work by introducing O2 from an ambient air source—ambient air is 21-percent oxygen (which varies somewhat with elevation). The air is compressed inside the filter vessel and the O2 is consumed by the different constituents in the water that accept oxidation; i.e., H2S, Fe, Mn, etc. In chemistry, stoichiometric ratio equations calculate how much O2 is needed to oxidize the target elements in water.

In the O2 Required Calculator (Chart 2), the existing values for the target nuisance metals and gas of Fe2+, Mn2+ and H2S are loaded into the equation and the resulting theoretical O2 demand show this water needing 0.944 mg/L of O2 to oxidize the Fe, Mn and H2S to ferric, manganic and sulfur or sulfate. In these forms they will mechanically strain using a filter media. The calculator goes on to show the available O2 in either a two-tank or single-tank configuration for a particular tank size. The calculator looks at a standard 10 x 54-inch filter, after air loading and compression, has enough air to process 870 gallons (3,293 liters) of this challenge water in a two-tank system and 290 gallons (1,097 liters) in a single-tank system.

The cautions with this technique are as follows:
1. The time required for oxidation is pH and temperature driven. Acidic water inhibits oxidative reactions with these contaminants. Therefore, water with a pH less than neutral pH 7 slows reaction times. Conversion of the targeted constituents may be incomplete, allowing them to pass through filtration.
2. The required O2 demand becomes problematic if the demand is greater than reasonably satisfied by the system— throughputs are determined by available O2 in the vessel(s).
3. Oxidized metals begin to form solids when exposed to air and will collect in the upper diffuser along the side surfaces of the control valve and inside the control valve.
4. These filters require preventive maintenance. Best practice has preventive maintenance occurring annually or sooner as determined by the designer.

The water treatment industry has numerous choices for media that incorporates the use of a catalyst. A catalyst is a substance that accelerates or changes the rate of a chemical reaction without being consumed or chemically changed by that chemical reaction. Pyrolusite and manganese greensand are two natural medias that support a catalytic action. In addition, several manufacturers commercially produce specialized media designed to work in conjunction with a catalyst. Some of these media choices require regeneration and others work with naturally and/or introduced O2 in combination with the catalyst. One thing common to most filtration media is the requirement for high backwash flowrates: from eight to 25 gpm (30 to 94 L/m) per square foot. Systems using these media choices require considerable water (in the hundreds of gallons) to backwash, cycle and rinse.
In an application where only ferrous iron is present in the source water (where the Mn 2+ is < 0.05 mg/L and H2S is non-detect), consider using catalytic collection without the use of aeration. These systems function without captured air; it leaves the Fe2+ in solution. As Fe2+ passes through the filter, it encounters the catalyst on the media. Oxygen released by this hybrid exchanger reacts with Fe2+ to form insoluble red ferric oxide (Fe2O3). Ferric oxide precipitates on the surface of the substrate and is thus trapped in the media bed.

During use, oxygen atoms are gradually depleted from the catalyst and a ferric oxide crust forms on the surface of the media. Before all the oxygen is depleted, a cleaning cycle is initiated to remove the accumulated Fe3+ and to replenish the media with fresh O2. The cleaning cycle begins with an air scour, which breaks the iron oxide crust away from the surface of the media substrate and provides the oxygen (from the air) needed to replenish the catalyst. Air scour is followed by a backwash to remove the ferric oxide crust, then by a brief rinse. Following the cleaning cycle, the system is ready for its next service run.

The media substrate that supports the catalyst is a thermoplastic and very light-weight. The advantage to this is low backwash flowrates. This media backwashes at three gpm/ft2 making it an excellent choice for low-producing wells and water conservation. This media does require air scour to insure proper cleaning and recharge. In addition to using less water to cycle, this system eliminates the issues of iron oxide formation in the controls and diffuser related to captured air.
Because the system uses collection, it has a finite throughput. This is not a filter. Once the media is loaded with iron oxide, it must be scoured and backwashed. This throughput is governed by the water severity. It is therefore necessary to speciate the iron and know the ratio of Fe2+ to Fe3+. The ferric iron needs to be at or below the Secondary Standard for Fe of 0.3 mg/L, with the balance of the iron being ferrous to avoid staining issues downstream.

1. This technology is for ferrous iron only. While it can attract manganese, there are no claims to this effect. It is a clear-water iron solution.
2. If the Fe3+ is greater the 0.3 mg/L, the system may require process filtration downstream.
3. Once the media is loaded, it is no longer effective. The system requires meter-initiated operation and a liberal reserve.
4. This media is NOT compatible with ozone or chlorine.

Mechanical straining and ozone
Ozone (O3) technology is nothing new. On large-scale projects it is quite complex. Used in conjunction with low-voltage 12- and 24-VDC corona discharge generators, it is a useful tool for captured air filtration systems. The biocidal effects of O3 help in controlling biofilm buildup inside captured air filters. Biofilm collects iron oxides and creates plugging issues on these types of filters. In addition, bringing in untreated ambient air can introduce outside contaminants into the customer’s potable water. Ozone destroys airborne contaminants before they enter water systems, while the O3-charged air column inside the tank works to control biofilm and organic fouling.

1. Always ensure that the materials contacted by ozone are ozone compatible. O3 is a powerful oxidizer and will degrade some materials.
2. Be aware of the O3 levels introduced into the water. A small generator will produce a few tenths of a grams per hour. Their intent is not to treat continuous flow applications. That takes considerably more O3 and considerably more system components. See Chart 3 for an example of O3 demand for a typical 5-gpm (18-L/m) flowrate. The captured air system batch treat with ozone during regeneration. Continuous O3 treatment requires continuous introduction of ozone. In this example, the water requires 4.48 grams/hour (see Chart 3).
3. Ozone, while a powerful biocide, is not intended as a solution for microbiologically unsafe water when introduced in a batch application in captured air filters. In addition, while it can assist in the control of sulfur-reducing bacteria and iron bacteria in a batch application within the filter, its effectiveness downstream is marginal or absent.

Hydrogen sulfide as H2S
For this discussion, the presence of H2S in source water plays a role in consumption of available O2 for oxidation. Again, looking at Charts 2 and 3 see that hydrogen sulfide requires several times more oxygen to convert H2S to elemental sulfur and H2O. This reaction limits the available O2 needed for conversion of ferrous iron to ferric. Therefore, when sizing aeration/oxidation solutions, consider the effect H2S plays in the equation. H2S and SRB (sulfur-reducing bacteria) are detailed topics and best discussed in a dedicated article. For information on H2S, check out Bryan Swistock (Senior Extension Associate/Water Resources Coordinator) at Penn State. His article explains sources of hydrogen sulfide and solutions (https://extension.psu.edu/hydrogen-sulfide-rotten-egg-odor-in-water-wells).

The laws of chemistry, hydraulics and physics are static. Try as we might, one cannot fool science. There are solutions, but there is not one solution to controlling nuisance problem water issues. Do the testing, consult with the operating specifications and do the math. Miss one key piece of data and a solution quickly becomes a problem. Investigate and be skeptical of claims that sound too good to be true. To this author’s knowledge, a single-source answer does not exist for the many levels of water severity across the country. Do not be afraid to consult with people of knowledge in the effort to satisfy the needs of the end users who rely on experts for answers.

About the author
Matthew Wirth is an Industrial Water Specialist with 40 years of experience working with large process systems, including RO, IEx, process filtration and media filtration. He is the General Manager of Water at Pargreen Sales Engineering in Chicago, IL. Wirth received his engineering training at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology in Rapid City, SD and earned a Bachelor’s Degree from Concordia University in St. Paul, MN. He can be reached via email, mwirth@pargreen.com or phone (630) 628-1330.

©2020 EIJ Company LLC, All Rights Reserved | tucson website design by Arizona Computer Guru